The verdict: Written content isn’t dying—it’s evolving into a trust-differentiated asset. While 82% of internet traffic is video and average attention spans have collapsed to 47 seconds, paradoxically: Substack hit a $1.1 billion valuation with 5 million paid subscribers, long-form content earns 77% more backlinks, and 62% of consumers distrust AI-generated content.
The real shift isn’t from “content vs. no content”—it’s from “content volume” to “content as proof of thinking.”
Dan Koe, with 4 million followers and over $4 million in annual revenue, captured it perfectly:
“Competent, forgettable writing is now $20/month via ChatGPT. The baseline got flooded. If your writing was already average, you’re now competing with infinite average. But the ceiling hasn’t moved. What makes writing great hasn’t changed: originality of thought, a voice that’s unmistakably yours, and the ability to make someone see something they hadn’t seen before.”
In this guide you’ll find a complete analysis of the debate, the data that matters, and a decision framework for executives who need to justify their content investment.
1. The Case Against: Why They Say Written Content Is Dead
The Absolute Dominance of Video
The numbers are striking and hard to ignore:
| Statistic | Source |
|---|---|
| 82% of all internet traffic will be video by 2025 | Cisco |
| 78% of consumers prefer learning about products via short video vs. 9% text | Wyzowl 2025 |
| Social videos are shared 1,200% more than text and images combined | Multiple studies |
| LinkedIn video posts achieve 3x more engagement than text-only | Industry data |
| 95% message retention from video vs. 10% from text | Insivia |
The Collapse of Attention Spans
Dr. Gloria Mark’s longitudinal research (UC Irvine/Microsoft) shows an 80% decline in attention span over 20 years:
- 2004: 2.5 minutes average attention on screens
- 2012: 75 seconds
- 2021-2025: 44-50 seconds (averaging 47 seconds)
68% of young people report difficulty concentrating on content lasting more than a minute. A 2025 APA meta-analytic study of 71 studies with 98,299 participants found correlation between short-form consumption and reduced cognitive capacity.
The AI Content Flood
The landscape changed dramatically:
- 71% of social media images are now AI-generated
- 49 major news outlets regularly publish AI-generated content
- Generative content market: $14.8 billion (2024) → $80.1 billion by 2030 (32.5% CAGR)
- 30-40% of web text now originates from AI systems, projected to reach 90%
- Companies can “publish 10,000 articles with resources previously required for one”
The Prosecution’s Argument
If you want to capture quick attention and maximize reach, video wins. Meta, YouTube, and TikTok algorithms explicitly favor video over text. In a world of fragmented attention, why would anyone read 2,000 words?
But this is where surface-level analysis stops. Let’s see the other side.
2. The Defense of Written Content: The Data Nobody Tells You
The SEO Reality That Contradicts the Narrative
| Statistic | Source |
|---|---|
| Top Google rankings average 2,000+ words | Big Drop Inc 2025 |
| Articles of 1,000+ words receive 77% more backlinks | Search Engine Land |
| 37% of bloggers publishing 2,000+ word posts report strong results vs. 20% for shorter content | Industry studies |
| Long-form content (3,000+ words) earns 3.5x more backlinks | SEOgismo 2025 |
| Time on page increases 40-70% for content over 1,500 words | Marketing LTB |
Long-form content doesn’t just survive—it dominates in organic search.
The Newsletter Renaissance
Substack (March 2025):
- $1.1 billion valuation after $100M Series C
- 5 million paid subscriptions
- $450 million estimated annual gross writer revenue
- 50+ publications earning at least $500K/year
- 95 million monthly visits (up 40% YoY)
Beehiiv (June 2025):
- $30M ARR (from $8M in 2024—138% growth)
- 28 billion emails sent in 2025
- 255 million unique readers reached
- 41%+ open rates across platform
- Median time to first dollar: 66 days
If written content were dead, why are newsletters exploding?
B2B’s Preference for Depth
This is where the argument becomes impossible to ignore for executives:
| Statistic | Source |
|---|---|
| 99% of B2B buyers say thought leadership is important/critical in decisions | Momentum ITSMA 2025 |
| 73% of B2B buyers prefer learning through articles, not ads | Marketing LTB |
| 67% consume 5+ pieces of content before engaging sales | SQ Magazine 2025 |
| Senior executives spend 4 hours/week consuming thought leadership | Gareth Lofthouse |
| 60% will pay a premium to suppliers with strong thought leadership | Edelman-LinkedIn 2024 |
| C-suite executives find articles and events the most valuable content types | MarketingProfs |
Dan Koe’s Insight on Impact
”There’s a reason you remember the author of a life-changing book more than you remember the last viral TikTok you watched. It’s because a book holds your attention for 8 hours while a post holds it for 5 seconds. You don’t have enough time to spark transformation in their life.”
3. The Trust Verdict: Why AI Created an Advantage for Humans
The AI Content Trust Deficit
Consumer trust data is revealing:
| Statistic | Source |
|---|---|
| 62% of consumers less likely to engage with content identified as AI | NielsenIQ 2025 |
| 52% reduced engagement once content is identified as AI-generated | NielsenIQ |
| AI content without human oversight ranks 40% lower in E-E-A-T signals | SmythOS 2025 |
| AI content with human oversight performs 4.1x better than fully automated | SmythOS |
| 57% of workers have made mistakes due to AI reliance | KPMG Trust Study 2025 |
E-E-A-T: The Signal Google Prioritizes
Google’s E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) has become more important precisely because AI can produce content that looks expert but lacks real experience.
Signals algorithms now value higher:
- Demonstrable experience: Content reflecting real first-hand experience
- Unique perspectives: Insights that can’t be synthesized from other sources
- Consistent voice: A recognizable style over time
- Citations and attributions: References to verifiable sources
Dan Koe’s Evolved Position on AI
”I said I’d never use AI to write. I meant it. But something has changed… I’ve found a process where AI handles a lot of the labor while I stay in control of the thinking, and personally I think this is the future of writing. The words on the page are still mine. But my job changed—and surprisingly I’m writing more than ever.”
The future isn’t human vs. AI. It’s humans using AI as a tool, not as a replacement.
4. The Decision Framework for Executives
When Written Content Wins
Written content is superior when:
- Complex purchase decisions: B2B, high tickets, long sales cycles
- Long-term trust building: Thought leadership, expert positioning
- SEO and organic discoverability: Google still indexes text better than video
- Audiences that research deeply: Executives, technical buyers, informed purchasers
- Evergreen content: Material that remains relevant for years
- Documentation and reference: Guides, tutorials, technical resources
When Video Wins
Video is superior when:
- Mass awareness: Reaching new, broad audiences
- Visual demonstration: Products that need to be seen in action
- Quick emotional connection: Storytelling, testimonials
- Mobile audiences: Consumption on the go
- Ephemeral content: Trends, reactions, current events
- Personality and charisma: When founder/CEO presence is the differentiator
The Reality: Hybrid Wins
For most B2B companies, the optimal strategy is hybrid:
Awareness (Video) → Consideration (Articles) → Decision (Case studies/Whitepapers)
Dan Koe’s content hierarchy explains it perfectly:
- Short-form content (tweets, reels): “Attracting a broad and somewhat shallow audience”
- Medium-form content (threads, carousels): “Display competence”
- Long-form content (newsletters, podcasts): “For the dedicated fans. They are aligned with your goals and want to learn as much as they can from you.”
Need to evaluate your content mix?
Use our ROI Calculator: Written Content vs. Video to analyze how much you should invest in each format based on your industry and goals.
5. The Content Strategy for 2026
The Newsletter-First Approach
The most effective strategy for executives in 2026 follows this order:
- Weekly newsletter: Your deepest and most valuable content
- Pillar articles: Comprehensive guides that rank in SEO
- LinkedIn posts: Excerpts and derivatives from the newsletter
- Twitter/X threads: Condensed versions for virality
- Occasional video: When the format warrants it
AI-Assisted Production, Human Direction
The modern content creation process:
- Human: Define the unique insight, perspective, the “why”
- AI: Help with research, structure, first draft
- Human: Edit, add voice, inject real experience
- AI: Reformat for different platforms
- Human: Final review and approval
This process allows producing more while maintaining authenticity.
”Content Debt” Management
Just as there’s technical debt, there’s content debt:
- Outdated articles that rank but misinform
- Mediocre content that dilutes your brand
- Old posts that contradict your current position
The strategy includes:
- Quarterly audit: Review existing content
- Update vs. delete: Decide what deserves investment
- Consolidation: Combine similar articles into stronger pillars
Ready for thought leadership?
Before investing in content, assess your current strategy’s maturity. Use our B2B Content Maturity Quiz to get a personalized diagnosis and action roadmap.
6. The Thought Leadership Imperative
Executive Presence as Competitive Advantage
The 2024 Edelman-LinkedIn report (7th year, 2,000 global professionals) revealed:
- 9 out of 10 decision-makers value thought leadership
- 60% of buyers will pay a premium to suppliers with strong thought leadership
- 47% of executives discovered and bought from companies thanks to their thought leadership
- “Hidden buyers”—those who read your content but never interact—represent a significant portion of your pipeline
The Cost of Not Investing
Executives who don’t create content:
- Are invisible to the 67% of buyers who research before contacting sales
- Miss the 60% premium that buyers pay for thought leadership
- Don’t build personal brand assets that transcend their current company
- Depend exclusively on outbound sales and paid advertising
The LATAM Opportunity
The Spanish-speaking market for executive thought leadership content is virtually untapped:
- Almost zero comprehensive Spanish-language resources
- Minimal competition on keywords like “executive ghostwriting” or “B2B thought leadership”
- Spanish-speaking executives consuming English content due to lack of alternatives
For companies serving the Latin American market, the window of opportunity is now.
7. Conclusion: Written Content Is Evolving, Not Dying
The Debate Synthesis
- Written content volume is being commoditized by AI
- Human-insight-driven writing is more valuable than ever
- Video wins attention; text wins trust and conversion
- B2B and executive audiences still require depth
- The future is hybrid: AI-assisted production, human-directed thinking
The Right Question Isn’t “Is Written Content Dead?”
The right question is: “Does your written content demonstrate original thinking that AI cannot replicate?”
If the answer is no, then yes—your content is competing with infinite average and will eventually become irrelevant.
If the answer is yes—if your content reflects real experience, unique perspectives, and an unmistakable voice—then you’re on the right side of the divergence.
Ready to elevate your content?
At Mazkara Studio we help executives and companies create thought leadership content that passes the “Human Test”—content with genuine insight, distinctive voice, and perspectives that build trust. Get your free consultation to explore how we can help you.
Related Tools
- ROI Calculator: Written Content vs. Video — Analyze your optimal investment in each format
- B2B Content Maturity Quiz — Assess how ready your company is for thought leadership
Have questions about this guide or want to discuss your content strategy? Reply to this newsletter or contact us at hola@mazkara.studio.